Information exchange between Child Safety and family courts only occurs where legislation permits the disclosure of information. For further information, refer to the practice resource Working with family courts and the Protocol between the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia and the Department of Child Safety Queensland.
Before exchanging relevant information, consider the following matters:
- the safety, well-being and best interests of the child are the paramount consideration
- any statutory requirements of privacy and security of personal information
- the well-being and protection of children at risk is generally better secured through the exchange of information between those concerned with the child and the family
- courts are in a better position to make appropriate orders if they are fully aware of proceedings in other jurisdictions.
Ensure that the information to be exchanged is limited to only that which is:
- relevant to the respective roles of each party
- relevant to the specific purpose for which it is disclosed
- in the best interests of the child involved in a particular matter.
Table of contents:
2.1 Family consultants
Family consultants (social workers or psychologists) may be assigned to a family court case, to:
- help parties to resolve a dispute
- assist and advise the court and give evidence about a case
- write and provide a report to the court about the family
- advise the court about the services provided to families by government, community and other agencies.
For further information, refer to the Family Consultants Fact Sheet .
Contact by a family consultant
Should a family consultant contact the CSSC directly to request information about a child or family, refer the family consultant to the Court Services Unit in the first instance. The Court Services Unit will advise the CSSC as to how to progress the family consultant's request.
2.2 Independent Children's Lawyers
An order for an Independent Children's Lawyer (ICL) may be made during family court proceedings. The ICL is appointed to represent and promote the best interests of a child in family law proceedings, by enabling the child to be involved in decision-making about the proceedings. The degree of the child's involvement is decided by the ICL, based on the extent to which the child wishes to be involved and the extent that is appropriate for the child having regard to the child's age, developmental level, cognitive abilities, emotional state and views.
Where a family court is aware that Child Safety has had some involvement with the child and their family, the court will usually make an order under the Family Law Act 1975 , section 91B, at the same time as an order appointing an ICL - refer to 4. Respond to an order requesting intervention by Child Safety - section 91B order.
For further information, refer to the 'Protocol between the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia and the Department of Child Safety Queensland' and the Guidelines for Independent Children's Lawyers .
Contact by an Independent Children's Lawyer
When an ICL is appointed by a family court, the ICL will contact Child Safety, to seek information about:
- the extent of any child protection involvement with the child or family, in particular, any abuse or neglect notifications and investigations
- if there has been any such involvement, whether Child Safety intends to become involved in the family law proceedings or is considering the initiation of other legal proceedings.
It is appropriate for the ICL and CSSC to liaise with each other in respect of any involvement Child Safety may have had, or has, with the child and family, however, it is necessary for the ICL to confirm their appointment prior to being provided with any information.
The ICL will demonstrate their appointment by providing a Notice of Address for Service form, a prescribed family court form. This requirement applies regardless of whether a family court case is designated as a Magellan matter - refer to 4.2 Magellan matter, including 91B order.
2.3 Magellan case management model
The Magellan case management model was developed to deal with family court cases involving serious allegations of physical and sexual child abuse, and involves:
- rigorous judicial management including the imposition of strict timeframes
- an early 'front loading' of resources such as the appointment of an Independent Children's Lawyer (ICL)
- requesting information from Child Safety early in the court process
- close liaison on case management between external information providers and a small team of judges, registrars and family consultants.
Only the Family Court of Australia has jurisdiction to deal with Magellan matters. Where a case is designated as a Magellan matter, an ICL may be appointed by the court and there is a requirement for Child Safety to respond - refer to 4.2 Magellan matter, including 91B order.
Generally, the aim is to complete Magellan cases within six months from the case being placed on the Magellan list by the court.
2.4 Court Services Unit
A Child Safety officer who is advised of, or provided with a copy of, a family law application should immediately inform the Court Services Unit. This enables the Court Services Unit to provide Crown Law with sufficient notice if required to attend court, and provides the CSSC or RIS with sufficient notice if they are required to prepare any written material in response to an application.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License